<

Overview :: Ducking Quackers

>
Name Position Age Skill Special  #  Pitch time Goals Chances Assists A. Chances Avg. grade Performance Status
Jack Edge K 31 11 10 70.99%         13.40 +2.40 (21.82%)
Bento Palhota K 21 6 4 28.40%         6.25 +0.25 (4.17%)
Alejandro Zarate D 30 11 12 85.19%     2 (0.17) 2 (0.17) 14.75 +3.75 (34.09%)
Margrott Chamberlin D 35 11 12 85.03%   1 (0.08) 3 (0.25) 3 (0.25) 11.33 +0.33 (3.03%)
Djati Subrata D 30 10 13 92.28% 1 (0.08) 5 (0.38) 4 (0.31) 5 (0.38) 13.23 +3.23 (32.31%)
Thorbjörn Berglin D 20 7 9 58.26% 1 (0.12) 1 (0.12) 3 (0.37) 4 (0.49) 8.56 +1.56 (22.22%)
Yoshitaka Miyosi D 17 4 5 27.08%         5.40 +1.40 (35.00%)
Ljubisa Vucinic M 22 10 13 81.87% 2 (0.17) 2 (0.17)   2 (0.17) 9.54 -0.46 (-4.62%)
Mee Prasertsakul M 26 10 14 99.15% 10 (0.72) 16 (1.15) 4 (0.29) 14 (1.00) 12.07 +2.07 (20.71%)
Montrel Dal Moro M 24 8 13 92.28% 2 (0.15) 11 (0.85)   2 (0.15) 8.69 +0.69 (8.65%)
Richie Lithgow M 20 5 10 64.58%   4 (0.44) 2 (0.22) 2 (0.22) 6.60 +1.60 (32.00%)
Nickie Mullins M 20 5 1 7.10%         4.00 -1.00 (-20.00%)
Maximo Mandelli M 19 5 7 38.35%   1 (0.19)     5.57 +0.57 (11.43%)
Manuel Stanekovic M 18 5 10 70.99% 1 (0.10) 2 (0.20) 5 (0.50) 6 (0.60) 6.70 +1.70 (34.00%)
Benito Arcari S 31 9 13 92.28% 3 (0.23) 9 (0.69) 2 (0.15) 5 (0.38) 9.92 +0.92 (10.26%)
Gerard van Tiggelen S 21 7 7 49.69% 3 (0.43) 11 (1.57)   3 (0.43) 8.86 +1.86 (26.53%)
Teruyuki Enamoto S 21 7 7 49.69% 3 (0.43) 9 (1.29) 1 (0.14) 4 (0.57) 8.57 +1.57 (22.45%)
64.31% 26 72 26 52 9.03 + 1.32 (17.30%)
  1. Dawlish Town - Ducking Quackers (3 - 1) [4-5-1 vs 3-5-2]
  2. Ducking Quackers - ILoveLamp (5 - 0) [4-5-1 vs 3-4-3]
  3. Ducking Quackers - SPASTICS (2 - 0) [4-3-3 vs 3-5-2]
  4. LL Urban Achievers - Ducking Quackers (2 - 0) [3-5-2 vs 4-3-3]
  5. Ducking Quackers - The Only Way Is EST (2 - 3) [3-5-2 vs 4-4-2]
  6. Istanbullers - Ducking Quackers (1 - 0) [3-5-2 vs 4-5-1]
  7. Ducking Quackers - Red Lion Heaven (4 - 0) [4-5-1 vs 4-4-2]
  8. Red Lion Heaven - Ducking Quackers (0 - 2) [4-5-1 vs 3-5-2]
  9. Ducking Quackers - Istanbullers (1 - 0) [4-5-1 vs 3-5-2]
  10. The Only Way Is EST - Ducking Quackers (0 - 2) [4-3-3 vs 3-5-2]
  11. Ducking Quackers - LL Urban Achievers (0 - 1) [4-4-2 vs 3-5-2]
  12. SPASTICS - Ducking Quackers (0 - 3) [3-5-2 vs 3-5-2]
  13. ILoveLamp - Ducking Quackers (0 - 2) [3-5-2 vs 3-5-2]
  14. Ducking Quackers - Dawlish Town (2 - 1) [3-4-3 vs 4-4-2]

Age spread

Back to top

Goals / chances produced by player

Back to top

Goals / chances produced by type

Back to top

Goals / chances produced by formation

Back to top

Home formation use / success

Back to top

Skill spread

Back to top

Assists / Assisted chances produced by player

Back to top

Goals / chances produced by time

Back to top

Goals / chances scored against formation

Back to top

Away formation use / success

Back to top