<

Overview :: Hardly Athletic F.C

>
Name Position Age Skill Special  #  Pitch time Goals Chances Assists A. Chances Avg. grade Performance Status
Neville Southall K 34 12 10 70.77%   2 (0.20)     14.50 +2.50 (20.83%)
Zac Dodd K 19 5 4 28.31%         5.00 -
Murray Carnie D 28 12 13 92.00%   3 (0.23) 3 (0.23) 3 (0.23) 15.77 +3.77 (31.41%)
Leighton Baines D 25 10 12 84.62% 1 (0.08) 1 (0.08) 1 (0.08) 2 (0.17) 13.00 +3.00 (30.00%)
Bernard Bondi D 26 9 12 83.00% 1 (0.09) 1 (0.09)   1 (0.09) 11.67 +2.67 (29.63%)
Seamus Coleman D 24 9 12 78.85%   1 (0.09) 1 (0.09) 1 (0.09) 11.08 +2.08 (23.15%)
Jarred Beech D 20 7 11 49.31%         7.91 +0.91 (12.99%)
Garrincha França D 19 4 7 11.85%         4.29 +0.29 (7.14%)
Jan Molby M 28 11 13 85.38% 10 (0.83) 24 (1.99) 4 (0.33) 14 (1.16) 12.31 +1.31 (11.89%)
Andreas Bardsley M 29 11 14 95.38% 5 (0.37) 10 (0.74) 4 (0.30) 9 (0.67) 13.57 +2.57 (23.38%)
Cris Accrington M 25 10 13 85.08% 1 (0.08) 9 (0.75) 1 (0.08) 2 (0.17) 11.85 +1.85 (18.46%)
Andy Reid M 25 10 14 94.62% 2 (0.15) 7 (0.52) 7 (0.52) 9 (0.67) 12.50 +2.50 (25.00%)
Cyrus Meadows M 18 5 9 51.85% 3 (0.41) 5 (0.68) 2 (0.27) 5 (0.68) 6.67 +1.67 (33.33%)
Micky Quinn S 27 11 10 54.54% 3 (0.39) 10 (1.30)   3 (0.39) 12.10 +1.10 (10.00%)
Araz Abdullayev S 25 10 14 92.77% 7 (0.53) 12 (0.92) 2 (0.15) 9 (0.69) 12.07 +2.07 (20.71%)
Mika Holmerin S 17 4   4 11.23%   1 (0.63)     4.00 -
James Lowrie S 17 4   7 20.38%   3 (1.04)     3.86 -0.14 (-3.57%)
64.11% 33 89 25 58 10.13 + 1.88 (19.62%)
  1. Hardly Athletic F.C - Kaizoku FC (6 - 0) [3-5-2 vs 4-4-2]
  2. Fishy Mystery - Hardly Athletic F.C (0 - 2) [4-5-1 vs 4-5-1]
  3. Hardly Athletic F.C - The Cheechsters (3 - 1) [4-4-2 vs 4-4-2]
  4. Hardly Athletic F.C - ILoveLamp (2 - 1) [5-3-2 vs 3-4-3]
  5. Hardly Athletic F.C - PES United (1 - 3) [4-4-2 vs 4-5-1]
  6. Dunkerrin Rovers - Hardly Athletic F.C (1 - 3) [3-5-2 vs 4-5-1]
  7. Surtur Rising - Hardly Athletic F.C (0 - 0) [4-4-2 vs 5-3-2]
  8. Hardly Athletic F.C - Surtur Rising (0 - 2) [4-4-2 vs 3-5-2]
  9. Hardly Athletic F.C - Dunkerrin Rovers (1 - 2) [3-5-2 vs 4-5-1]
  10. PES United - Hardly Athletic F.C (2 - 0) [4-5-1 vs 4-4-2]
  11. ILoveLamp - Hardly Athletic F.C (0 - 5) [3-4-3 vs 4-5-1]
  12. The Cheechsters - Hardly Athletic F.C (3 - 1) [4-5-1 vs 4-4-2]
  13. Hardly Athletic F.C - Fishy Mystery (6 - 0) [4-4-2 vs 4-5-1]
  14. Kaizoku FC - Hardly Athletic F.C (2 - 4) [3-4-3 vs 4-4-2]

Age spread

Back to top

Goals / chances produced by player

Back to top

Goals / chances produced by type

Back to top

Goals / chances produced by formation

Back to top

Home formation use / success

Back to top

Skill spread

Back to top

Assists / Assisted chances produced by player

Back to top

Goals / chances produced by time

Back to top

Goals / chances scored against formation

Back to top

Away formation use / success

Back to top