<

Overview :: Hardly Athletic F.C

>
Name Position Age Skill Special  #  Pitch time Goals Chances Assists A. Chances Avg. grade Performance Status
Neville Southall K 33 12 14 93.10%         13.60 +2.53 (23.05%)
Jean Bouquet K 21 5 1 5.67%         4.10 -0.90 (-18.00%)
Murray Carnie D 27 11 14 98.77%     2 (0.14) 2 (0.14) 14.56 +3.56 (32.34%)
Leighton Baines D 24 10 14 96.17%   1 (0.07)     11.89 +2.81 (31.21%)
Bernard Bondi D 25 9 13 82.21% 1 (0.09) 1 (0.09)   1 (0.09) 11.02 +2.95 (36.78%)
Seamus Coleman D 23 8 12 68.25%     1 (0.10) 1 (0.10) 9.15 +2.07 (29.35%)
Jarred Beech D 18 4 8 21.86%         5.15 +1.15 (28.75%)
Andreas Bardsley M 28 11 14 98.77% 2 (0.14) 6 (0.43) 2 (0.14) 4 (0.29) 12.53 +2.46 (24.60%)
Jan Molby M 26 10 10 55.67% 3 (0.38) 15 (1.90) 3 (0.38) 6 (0.76) 12.21 +2.21 (22.10%)
Andy Reid M 24 10 14 88.65% 1 (0.08) 4 (0.32)   1 (0.08) 10.46 +0.46 (4.57%)
Tomas Brolin M 33 9 14 79.83% 2 (0.18) 8 (0.71)   2 (0.18) 10.65 +1.65 (18.33%)
Cris Accrington M 24 9 12 84.66% 1 (0.08) 6 (0.50) 2 (0.17) 3 (0.25) 10.98 +2.89 (35.90%)
Michael Shuttlewood M 18 4 7 22.78%   1 (0.31) 1 (0.31) 1 (0.31) 4.44 +0.44 (11.07%)
Micky Quinn S 26 10 12 72.93% 1 (0.10) 2 (0.19)   1 (0.10) 10.76 +0.76 (7.58%)
Araz Abdullayev S 24 10 14 88.65% 4 (0.32) 9 (0.72)   4 (0.32) 10.54 +1.47 (16.43%)
Kyle Pearse S 21 6 8 24.77% 1 (0.28) 1 (0.28)   1 (0.28) 4.91 -0.21 (-3.75%)
Rhys Axhorn S 19 4 2 3.76% 1 (1.88) 2 (3.76)   1 (1.88) 4.20 +0.20 (5.00%)
63.91% 17 56 11 28 9.48 + 1.56 (17.96%)
  1. Hardly Athletic F.C - Port Killers (0 - 1) [3-5-2 vs 4-5-1]
  2. NHMess - Hardly Athletic F.C (0 - 2) [4-4-2 vs 4-5-1]
  3. SevensEleven - Hardly Athletic F.C (2 - 0) [4-5-1 vs 4-4-2]
  4. The Smiling Goats - Hardly Athletic F.C (2 - 0) [3-5-2 vs 3-5-2]
  5. Hardly Athletic F.C - Spirit of Shankly (3 - 0) [4-5-1 vs 4-5-1]
  6. Hardly Athletic F.C - The Eleven Men (1 - 1) [4-4-2 vs 3-5-2]
  7. PES United - Hardly Athletic F.C (1 - 0) [4-4-2 vs 4-4-2]
  8. Hardly Athletic F.C - PES United (3 - 1) [3-5-2 vs 4-4-2]
  9. The Eleven Men - Hardly Athletic F.C (2 - 2) [4-5-1 vs 4-5-1]
  10. Spirit of Shankly - Hardly Athletic F.C (0 - 2) [4-4-2 vs 5-3-2]
  11. Hardly Athletic F.C - The Smiling Goats (3 - 0) [3-5-2 vs 4-5-1]
  12. Hardly Athletic F.C - SevensEleven (1 - 0) [3-4-3 vs 3-5-2]
  13. Hardly Athletic F.C - NHMess (0 - 1) [4-4-2 vs 3-5-2]
  14. Port Killers - Hardly Athletic F.C (2 - 0) [3-5-2 vs 4-3-3]

Age spread

Back to top

Goals / chances produced by player

Back to top

Goals / chances produced by type

Back to top

Goals / chances produced by formation

Back to top

Home formation use / success

Back to top

Skill spread

Back to top

Assists / Assisted chances produced by player

Back to top

Goals / chances produced by time

Back to top

Goals / chances scored against formation

Back to top

Away formation use / success

Back to top